Case evaluation
Discriminación
Tell us what happened and where. Nothing here is legal advice, and nothing on this page predicts what any case is worth.
Prepare su consulta
Anote cuándo y dónde ocurrió, qué personas o entidades participaron y cómo le afectó. No necesita conocer el nombre legal de una reclamación. Responda No estoy seguro cuando corresponda.
¿Cuánto podría valer mi caso?
Este formulario solicita una evaluación; no calcula una cantidad de dinero. Los hechos, las pruebas y la ley aplicable requieren revisión individual. En defensa penal no se calcula una indemnización civil.
Consultar información y fuentes del caso (en inglés) ↗
Honorarios
No hay honorarios de abogado sin recuperación en un caso elegible aceptado con honorarios contingentes. Los gastos y demás condiciones dependen del acuerdo. La defensa penal tiene honorarios distintos.
Derecho laboral
Tres pasos. Responda las preguntas pertinentes y luego envíe sus datos de contacto.
1 de 3 · Su situación
Solicite una evaluación de su caso ↗
Check your case factors — five questions, nothing sent
Can these settlements predict my result?
No. Any figure below is one case, reported by the source named beneath it. They are other people’s cases — not our results, not typical, and not a prediction for anyone else. What a particular claim is worth depends on the evidence, responsibility, treatment, losses, future needs, insurance and the law of that state.
Published settlement context
Court-approved 2022 employment settlement fund for eligible claimants alleging…
$18 millionCourt-approved 2022 employment settlement fund for eligible claimants alleging harassment, pregnancy discrimination and retaliation.
Group settlement fund · 2022. Group settlement fund, not one person’s recovery or a record claim.
Reported 2022
Source: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (opens in a new tab)EEOC v. City of North Richland Hills — Robert Coffman
$75,000Age-harassment and constructive-discharge allegations involving an HVAC technician.
Settlement documented by official source · December 15, 2009. 4:08-cv-558-Y Whole-case settlement, not a national average or prediction. Fees and net proceeds are not verified.
Reported 2009-12-15 · Case no. 4:08-cv-558-Y
Source: U.S. EEOC — consent-decree announcement (opens in a new tab)Worker’s disability charge against Everport Terminal Services
$200,000Port of Oakland mechanic’s disability-accommodation claim; agreement includes back pay and compensatory damages.
Settlement documented by official source · July 2, 2025. Employee name not disclosed. Amount resolves discrimination allegations, not compensation for causing the underlying disability.
Reported 2025-07-02
Source: U.S. EEOC — conciliation announcement (opens in a new tab)Free case evaluation
Get your free
case evaluation.
Tell us what happened and where. Add more details if you want, then send your request.